WHO: University of Connecticut vs. Indiana University
WHEN: Empire Classic -- November 19, 2023
SCORE: UConn 77-57
Despite the absence of potential lottery guard Stephon Castle of UConn, the matchup between Donovan Clingan and Kel'el Ware was a fascinating matchup between NBA prospect big men with clashing styles.
Donovan Clingan
7 points (1-3 shooting, 5-8 from the free throw line), 9 rebounds, 2 assists (2 turnovers), 2 blocks, 2 steals
Offense: Donovan Clingan was bothered by Kel'el Ware's size, as he was held to just 3 shot attempts and wasn't much of a factor within UConn's offensive attack. However, his role has NBA scalability. While they did utilize him in the post -- like college teams would for big men of his size (7'2", 280 pounds) -- UConn had him hang around the perimeter as a screening and connective hub. His screening, in particular, generates a ton of space and looks for ball-handlers. Despite his limited field goal attempts, he was a monster on the offensive glass (7 rebounds) and made his way to the free throw line down low and on the roll. Though UConn didn't activate his playmaking too much, he made intriguing reads out of the low block.
Defense: Clingan's size as a defender is so imposing; he's a legitimate drop coverage nightmare. He bothered Ware in the low post (more on that) with his physicality and verticality without fouling. His instincts are sound for a big of his size, utilizing them for altering shots and generating deflections.
What I'm monitoring going forward: Per-minute production translating. Clingan solidifed himself as a young big man to watch in college basketball with his shot-blocking and efficiency in limited action last season. With a larger role, how many more minutes will follow? Will the production continue to translate with more playing time? Clingan played a career-high 30 minutes in this game, and made his presence felt throughout the game. His production in this capacity could determine his outlook as a NBA starting center.
Kel'el Ware
11 points (2-10 shooting, 2-4 from 3, 5-6 from the free throw line), 7 rebounds, 0 assists (3 turnovers), 0 blocks, 0 steal
Offense: Kel'el Ware's role was pretty perplexing. Despite the weight discrepenacy between him and Clingan (210 vs. 280), they ran too many post actions for Ware, which defeats the athletic advantages he poses. It's a role that just felt unnatural to him. He connected on 2 triples, displaying a fluid form from the outside. They should've put him in position to utilize his athleticism as a play finisher.
Defense: Ware limited Clingan offensively, preventing him from having too much of an offensive impact. However, Clingan did haul in 7 offensive rebounds. Nonetheless, Ware has some switchy tools, which allows him to diversify his coverages in space -- coming to the level, dropping, or switching.
What I'm monitoring going forward: Can his skill come closer to his athletic tools? We've seen athletic big men fall down the draft boards, because they're utlimately too raw. Ware has good touch on his outside shot and is a fluid athlete for his size. Indiana leveraging his tools to an advantage, while easing him into more skill-based roles -- rolling decision-making, outside shooting, and live-dribble actions.
Mackenzie Mbgako
Offense: Mackenzie Mbgako had a quiet game from both a usage and shot volume standpoint (just 3 shot attempts). Even in the quick flashes, his shooting form is pretty clean. In addition, they put the ball in his hands to create a side-action pick-and-roll with Ware. At this stage, he may be more of a transition threat and a play finisher on this team.
Defense: Mbgako didn't generate any defensive events, but he showed upside as a plus defender. Indiana had him defending at the point-of-attack a good bit, allowing him to use his size and length to bother primary initiators. He also showed good screen navigation around on and off-ball actions.
What I'm monitoring going forward: Can he show enough upside in a limited role? In fairness, Mbgako is a freshman, and Mike Woodson could be easing him into the college game. Will he eventually entrust Mgbako with more playing time and responsibilities to showcase his upside as an athletic 3-and-D wing? He clearly has interesting tools that are enticing in today's NBA. How quickly Woodson allows Mbgako to spread his wings could determine when he's ultimately coming into the draft.
Alex Karaban
Offense: Karaban's 3-point shooting percentage wasn't great, but his volume (6) was encouraging. His movement, in particular, caught my eye. Off-ball, he sought screening opportunities, while relocating for better availability on jumpers. On-ball, he showed more juice off the dribble than expected getting to the rim, though he doesn't have a ton of athleticism and burst at the rim.
Defense: Karaban got picked on a bit defensively. His lateral quickness is subpar, and opponents rose over him when they got two feet in the paint.
What I'm monitoring going forward: Shooting prowess in a healthy lineup. This UConn team is deep, and this game didn't have Castle in there. An optimized team allows Karaban to be a complementary shooter, and his prowess in that role could determine his NBA future.
コメント